← Back to overall timeline
Increment 0113 Apr 2027Recreation Center / HVACDecision

Performance stage construction

A $3.72 million, FY27 3400-funded SABER construction requirement tests minor-construction funding and whether trainees reconcile two jointly issued designs that occupy the same facility volume.

The situation, for each audience

Keep the trainer context out of trainee packets and read-aloud materials.

Trainee facing · Read aloud

Current situation

Recreation Services (713 FSS), led by Ms. Mei Ling, needs a fixed performance stage constructed in the FOXHOUND Recreation Center and ready for use within twelve weeks. The stage will support ceremonies and command information briefings. It must be twenty feet wide, centered against the western wall of the auditorium, and include building-anchored upper framing and a lighting-and-sound support grid approximately fifteen feet above the floor.

The purchase request identifies a $3.72 million total approved project cost and cites fiscal year 2027 Operation and Maintenance, Air Force (3400) funds. The requirement is being planned as a SABER task order with Outer Heaven Builders, LLC, as the prime contractor and Dead Cell Stage & Rigging, LLC, identified in the prime’s preliminary subcontracting approach. Civil Engineering (713 CES) has prepared a 30-percent stage schematic that is internally coherent at that level and falls below the Air Force less-than-35-percent design criterion used for this SABER program. Your contracting team must determine whether the requirement is properly funded and what acquisition-planning and coordination actions are needed before the task order proceeds.

You receive the proposed HVAC-renewal requirement in [B] at the same time. Your trainer tells you that [A] and [B] are the only two requirements planned for the Recreation Center at this time; you do not need to ask whether another Recreation Center project exists.

Trainer only · Do not issue

Facilitator context

Release at Increment 1 with [B]. Both requirements are construction. A-01 deliberately cites 3400 funds so trainees may initially treat the purchase request as an impermissible color-of-money problem. Do not resolve it for them immediately; ask them to test purpose, time, and amount.

The intended fiscal-law result is that all three are proper. Purpose is satisfied because 10 U.S.C. § 2805(c) permits Operation and Maintenance appropriations for an unspecified minor military construction project costing not more than $4 million. Time is satisfied because FY27 annual 3400 funds support an FY27 bona fide need and obligation. Amount is satisfied because the form certifies sufficient funds and the $3.72 million total approved project cost is below the $4 million statutory limit. Only the funding color should initially look unusual.

Because the $3.72 million project exceeds $750,000, trainees should also verify the required advance approval under 10 U.S.C. § 2805(b)(1), confirm that $3.72 million is the total approved project cost, and ensure the requirement was not split to avoid a threshold.

The 30-percent package is intentionally below—not at—the Air Force less-than-35-percent design criterion used for this SABER program. That resolves only this vehicle-design fact; trainees must still check scope, ordering period, ceiling, and other task-order conditions.

Before asking for a decision, ask the trainees whether they verified purpose, time, and amount. If they missed the 3400 issue, let that question lead them into the statutory analysis, then return to the stage package.

After the fiscal checkpoint, ask only: “Are there any changes you would suggest making?” and “Is it ready to award yet?” A-02, B-02, and B-03 are already in the jointly issued packets. If trainees ask what the overhead space looks like, direct them to the canvas air-distribution elevation in B-02 and the straight route in B-03; do not issue a separate overhead-information handout.

Release A-06 if trainees compare the requirements, identify the shared-space conflict, and ask Civil Engineering for a lower or deconflicted stage design. A-06 lowers the upper frame and support-grid elevation. If they instead request an HVAC reroute, use [B] and release B-05. Incorporating either revision before award leads to [AG]. If trainees approve both packages without either revision, the original designs are locked into the awards and the team proceeds to [AB]. If they say a package is not ready, require them to name a concrete unresolved change and return to the first question.

Trainer clue bank

Regulatory signposts

10 sources

Direct trainees to a citation when they need a narrower clue. Have them apply the contract’s actual clauses, current thresholds, local policy, and the facts before treating any signpost as dispositive.

Give initially

5 records

These establish the decision without answering the factual questions trainees should identify.

A-01

Recreation Services (713 FSS) purchase request

Presents the fixed-stage scope, $3.72 million total approved project cost, and FY27 3400 funding citation for trainee review.

Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Word copy
A-02

Stage 30% design package

Shows an internally coherent 30-percent construction schematic—below the Air Force less-than-35-percent design criterion used for this SABER program—without the separate HVAC route.

Draft document availablePDF · 3 pages · Editable Word copy
A-03

Recreation Center existing floor plan

Shows the facility layout, rooms, exterior doors, and bay openings without depicting either planned construction requirement.

Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Word copy
A-04

Operational-need-date memorandum

States the 24 June 2027 need date and intermediate user milestones, creating schedule pressure without selecting an acquisition method.

Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Word copy
A-05

Coefficient-based independent Government cost estimate

Applies the fictional localized FY27 UPG and awarded SM-SABER-01 coefficients to a planning-level takeoff that reconciles exactly to the $3.72 million purchase request.

Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Excel workbook

Trainer addition

2 prompts

Give only after trainees have read and discussed the event. Use it to narrow attention without disclosing the answer.

Use this addition once across [A] and [B], after trainees have read and discussed both Recreation Center packages.

Say: ‘DAFFARS 5307.103(h) reminds the acquisition team to ensure consistency among requirements, acquisition planning, market research, and solicitation documents. What should this team compare before either requirement is awarded?’ If the team already identified the completed-space conflict, credit that observation and continue without repeating the hint.

Give only after trainee prompting

3 records

Use the prompt as a release gate; close-enough trainee questions should count when they seek the same underlying fact.

Prompt / triggerHandoutExercise purpose
PromptAfter trainees identify the stage/HVAC overhead conflict and ask Civil Engineering (713 CES) for a revised or deconflicted stage design
HandoutA-06
Revised stage schematic
Draft document availablePDF · 2 pages · Editable Word copy
PurposeProvides an updated form of A-02 with a lower stage top and support-grid elevation so the completed stage clears the canvas air-distribution duct and supports described in B-02.
PromptAfter trainees question whether FY27 3400 Operation and Maintenance funds may lawfully fund the stage construction
HandoutA-07
10 U.S.C. § 2805 — Unspecified minor construction
Final official source availableOfficial U.S. House Office of the Law Revision Counsel statutory text.
PurposeProvides the statutory authority and requires trainees to distinguish the $9 million unspecified-minor-construction ceiling, the $4 million O&M-funded construction limit, and the separate advance-approval requirement above $750,000.
PromptOnly after A-07 has been released and trainees identify that the $3.72 million project exceeds the $750,000 advance-approval threshold
HandoutA-08
Advance project-approval memorandum
Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Word copy
PurposeConfirms that Secretary of War Bridget Strand approved the project in advance under 10 U.S.C. § 2805(b)(1), allowing trainees to complete the purpose, time, and amount check without a hidden approval defect.

What a strong analysis should surface

  1. Purpose: the 3400 citation is not disqualifying. 10 U.S.C. § 2805(c) permits Operation and Maintenance funds for qualifying unspecified minor construction costing not more than $4 million.
  2. Time: A-01 cites FY27 annual O&M for an FY27 bona fide need and planned obligation, so the exercise contains no expired-funds defect.
  3. Amount: the certified balance is sufficient and the $3.72 million total approved project cost is below the $4 million O&M construction limit.
  4. Also verify the advance approval required above $750,000 and the absence of project splitting; a SABER vehicle does not create project authority or funds.
  5. Vehicle fit: the stage package is 30 percent design, below the Air Force less-than-35-percent design criterion used for this SABER program. Trainees must still verify scope, ordering period, task-order ceiling, and every other vehicle term.
  6. Price planning: A-05 is a Government estimate, not a contractor quote or negotiated task-order price. Its exact agreement with the purchase request does not, by itself, establish price reasonableness or complete the vehicle and technical reviews.
  7. A-02, B-02, and B-03 are initially available. If trainees ask what the overhead space looks like, direct them to the written elevation in B-02 and the straight route shown in B-03.
  8. An internally complete construction design can still conflict with a separately awarded Government requirement.
  9. The strongest path compares the two projects’ final spatial envelopes and resolves the conflict before award. Either lowering the stage through A-06 or rerouting the HVAC through B-05 is a modeled acceptable solution.
  10. Sequencing the HVAC and stage projects does not cure a conflict in their completed configurations.

Available response options

2 options

Offer options in plain language and accept equivalent trainee analysis. Do not reveal the assessment labels. Use each availability gate before accepting a contextual response, and use the trainer line to redirect a superfluous answer immediately.

How to run this node: Before either response prompt, ask: “Have you verified purpose, time, and amount?” If trainees question the FY27 3400 funding, release A-07. Release A-08 only if they then identify the $750,000 advance-approval threshold and ask whether approval exists. Resume with A1 and record only the changes the team actually requests. Release A-06 if they identify the stage/HVAC conflict and request a lower stage design; if they request an HVAC reroute, use [B] and release B-05. Then ask A2. Award locks in both packages in their current states.

A1Strong

Trainer asks: “Are there any changes you would suggest making?”

Available when
After the purpose, time, and amount checkpoint
Trainer line
Identify the specific change and the fact supporting it. A request to lower the stage releases A-06; a request to reroute the HVAC is handled under [B] and releases B-05. Sequencing alone would help only if the completed configurations were compatible, but it does not remove this conflict. What physical revision, if any, do you want?
Leads next
Apply any supported, specifically requested changes, then proceed to A2.
A2Strong

Trainer asks: “Is it ready to award yet?”

Available when
After the team has resolved or accepted the changes it identified under A1
Trainer line
Your answer locks in both current design packages. If you say no, identify the concrete unresolved change and return to A1. If you say yes, either A-06 or B-05 must already be incorporated to reach [AG]; an award with neither reaches [AB].
Leads next
No → return to A1. Yes with A-06 or B-05 incorporated → [AG]. Yes with neither → [AB].