← Back to overall timeline
Increment 086 Jul 2027Headquarters / Community CenterDecision

Community Support Center planning

A low-pressure file-readiness check makes trainees inspect purpose, time, amount, and the planned MACC competition before the records become evidence in [F].

The situation, for each audience

Keep the trainer context out of trainee packets and read-aloud materials.

Trainee facing · Read aloud

Current situation

The Mother Base Community Support Center requires major renovation and is considered equal in mission priority to Campbell Hall. The buildings have similar square footage. A signed Civil Engineering Squadron (713 CES) wall-system survey reports that every identified Community Center wall system tested negative for asbestos.

The planning package covers recreation rooms, administrative offices, a commercial kitchen, and a perpetually occupied corner table reserved for a retiree in a ghillie suit who has reportedly been waiting for bingo night since 1964. Review the file as the next major-renovation action in the FY27 workload.

Trainer only · Do not issue

Facilitator context

Release at Increment 8 as an intentionally easy file-readiness check and as retained background for [F]. E-04 is the Government's $31.20 million division-level planning estimate and is controlled under FAR 36.203. E-05 is correct in purpose, fiscal year, project amount, and routing, but Finance has not signed the certifying-official block. Under FAR 32.702 the Contracting Officer therefore lacks written assurance that funds are available, so the amount presently available for award is $0.

The package also has not been competed among the SM-MACC-01 awardholders. After trainees read the documents, use the Trainer Addition to ask whether the requirement is ready for award and listen for purpose, time, amount, and fair opportunity. Do not offer response options. Retain E-01 through E-05 for [F]. Release the neutral E-06 factual comparison only when trainees later ask how the buildings, work, materials, plans, access, or acquisition records differ; E-06 does not decide the scope issue for them.

Trainer clue bank

Regulatory signposts

6 sources

Direct trainees to a citation when they need a narrower clue. Have them apply the contract’s actual clauses, current thresholds, local policy, and the facts before treating any signpost as dispositive.

Give initially

5 records

These establish the decision without answering the factual questions trainees should identify.

E-01

Community Support Center requirement summary

Introduces PL-27-021 as a separate major-renovation planning action, records the high mission priority, and notes the building's broad similarity to Campbell Hall.

Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Word copy
E-02

Simplified Community Support Center floor plan

Shows the approximately 28,000-square-foot rectangular footprint and major functional spaces without depicting renovation scope.

Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Word copy
E-03

Signed CES wall-system asbestos survey

Records eighteen negative wall-system samples and makes the later substitution proposal initially attractive.

Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Word copy
E-04

Independent Government Cost Estimate

Provides the division-level $31.20 million Government estimate, localized for rural Alaska, and reveals the Community Center's major cost drivers without yet comparing them to Campbell Hall.

Draft document availablePDF · 2 pages · Editable Excel workbook
E-05

Community Support Center AF Form 9 purchase request

Shows an otherwise complete $31.20 million FY24 MILCON purchase request whose Finance certifying-official signature block is blank.

Draft document availablePDF · 1 page · Editable Word copy

Trainer addition

1 prompt

Give only after trainees have read and discussed the event. Use it to narrow attention without disclosing the answer.

After trainees review the initial file, ask: ‘Is this requirement ready for award?’ If needed, ask them to verify purpose, time, and amount, then whether the proposed MACC task order has been competed among the MACC awardholders. On the intended record, purpose and time are proper, but the unsigned Finance certification leaves no amount supported for award ($0), and no MACC fair-opportunity competition has yet occurred. Stop after they identify those two award blockers; [E] has no response menu.

Give only after trainee prompting

1 record

Use the prompt as a release gate; close-enough trainee questions should count when they seek the same underlying fact.

Prompt / triggerHandoutExercise purpose
PromptAsk whether the two buildings truly require similar work, compare their plans, materials or delivery conditions, or test the factual basis for the proposed substitution
HandoutE-06
Community Center and Campbell Hall work comparison
Draft document availablePDF · 2 pages · Editable Word copy
PurposeProvides a neutral side-by-side record of the facilities, work packages, materials, phasing, access, price records, and acquisition status without making a contract-scope conclusion.

What a strong analysis should surface

  1. Purpose: the modeled FY24 Military Construction, Air Force (3300) citation is appropriate to the separately authorized Community Support Center major-renovation project.
  2. Time: FY24 MILCON remains current for a planned FY27 obligation on the exercise record.
  3. Amount: because Finance has not signed E-05's certifying-official block, the Contracting Officer lacks written assurance that any amount is available; the executable amount is $0 under FAR 32.702.
  4. Competition: the proposed MACC order has not been presented to the SM-MACC-01 awardholders for fair opportunity, and no exception is documented.
  5. Retain E-01 through E-05 for [F]. E-06 supplies factual differences only; trainees must make the later scope and acquisition judgment themselves.